April 2007
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            






I can lose, too
Being owned
And what does that say about me?
Hassan wants revenge
EPT Monte Carlo
Schenefeld Open
Full stomach, big fun
Katja made EPT final table in Warsaw
3rd, wow
Go, Lucky, Go!



Thomas on Back from Cardiff
Eve Campbell on I can lose, too
cockmongrel on I can lose, too
Henning on I can lose, too
Mirjam on Being owned
Simon Young on I can lose, too
shaGa on Being owned
Matt on I can lose, too
Bonushure on I can lose, too
Razboynik on Being owned
calldown on Being owned
garthpower on Being owned
wusel on And what does that say about me?
OpaaufPoka on And what does that say about me?
freddy on And what does that say about me?
torschtl on And what does that say about me?
stef on And what does that say about me?
Eve Campbell on And what does that say about me?
Seb on And what does that say about me?
ragen on Hassan wants revenge
50outs on Hassan wants revenge
on Hassan wants revenge
brandon on EPT Monte Carlo
any2nofoldem on Full stomach, big fun
Florian K. on Schenefeld Open


April 2007 (4)
March 2007 (8)
February 2007 (1)
January 2007 (3)
December 2006 (6)
November 2006 (10)
October 2006 (9)
September 2006 (9)
August 2006 (11)
July 2006 (18)
June 2006 (14)
May 2006 (7)
April 2006 (5)
March 2006 (6)
February 2006 (8)
January 2006 (4)
December 2005 (4)
November 2005 (1)
October 2005 (4)
September 2005 (4)
August 2005 (6)
July 2005 (3)
June 2005 (3)
May 2005 (5)
April 2005 (3)
March 2005 (5)
February 2005 (6)
January 2005 (9)
December 2004 (4)
November 2004 (7)
October 2004 (7)
September 2004 (3)


Our poker life


A Fool And His Money
B@nd!t's german poker blog
Chris Halverson's Blog
DoubleAs
Felicia's Blog
Fellknight.com
Guinness And Poker
Las Vegas and Poker Blog
Lion Tales
Luckbox.de
Mean Gene's Poker Blog
Poker Grub
Poker Perspectives-Maudie's Blog
Poker Quest
PokerWorks, TableTango!
StoxPoker.com - Blogs and strategy
Tao of Poker
The Cards Speak
The Poker Chronicles


Barry Greenstein
Daniel Negranau
John Juanda
Michael Keiner
Paul Philips
Phil Hellmuth


IntelliPoker.com
Poker Newsgroup (RecPoker)


Online Holdem Inspector
PokerCharts (Web)
PokerOffice (Windows)
PokerStove: Software and Analysis
PokerTracker (Windows)





Our poker books
(curently over 50)
in: Unsorted images

Screen space
Up to 12 tables at once (never done that)
in: Unsorted images

Card protector
Nice present from Katja
from: www.dealerbuttons.com



Visit RakeBrain with the best rakeback deals. We have numerous deals, among them a great Full Tilt rakeback offer.


Nevada Jacks
Nevada Jacks Poker Chips are made in the USA! Get casino grade custom poker chips delivered in under 2 weeks! OR Get Free Poker Chips via Poker Source Online!

Top Online Poker
Read our poker room reviews for top bonuses.
Top15Poker.com
Find the best High roller bonus and No deposit bonus on the Internet.
Read unbiased Internet blackjack and Internet roulette room reviews. Visit our popular Golden Palace casino review.
NetBet.org

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

Locations of visitors to this page


Mail from Barry Greenstein Aug 16, 2005/03:13 PM

I got an email from Barry Greenstein regarding a hand we played together in the WSOP this year and which I won very luckily. If you can't remember, find it here. The hand got a lot of attention and was analyzed and discussed in quite a few places. There is a full thread about it in Daniel Negrenau's poker forum and I found one very well written review of the play written by John from "For a better tomorrow".


Barry's wrote in his email that he thinks I am wrong in some details about the hand. Let me share his view:

[...]

You will probably be disappointed to find out that you misremembered the hand. Here is what actually happened:

You raised in, in first position, and I reraised and you made it four bets. The cap in the limit games at the World Series was five bets (a bet and four raises), and I decided not to cap it. At this point, I was the clear leader at the table. I assumed you had Queens or better, or Ace-King suited. I thought Aces was the most likely hand for you, since you weren't in nearly as good shape as I was, and you would be crippled if you lost this hand.

The flop came K-7-3. I check and called, waiting for the turn to raise.

The turn was ugly for me, an Ace. I suspected I might already be beat. I could have raised, but decided to play it conservatively. If you had Aces, calling (or actually folding) is the best. If you had Ace-King I will lose a bet, but I still might regain that bet if I read you for some concern on the river. In case you have neither of these and are out on a limb, a call may get me another bet on the river.

The river was a truly disgusting second Ace. I was sure I was beat and I checked. I wanted to show you my hand before I decided whether to call, but the WSOP rules forbid that. I said, "You might had thought you had me, but you got very lucky here." Then I said, "Call," before showing it. I didn't put any chips in to the pot yet as I showed my Kings. I only put chips in the pot after you showed your Ace-King. I felt I lost the minimum. If I would have won that pot, I would have had more than 40% of the chips at the table with six players still remaining.

[...]
Now, who am I to disagree with Barry Greenstein. My guess is he plays successfully for a reason and having door-like holes in his memory may not be the kind of weakness this guy has. So I admit he is right and my memory does not serve me to well these days; in my memory the action took place slighly different, he said "I hit my hand on the flop also pretty well" before folding and no chips from him went into the pot on the river. In that regard I just saw a study in TV about eye-wittnesses on traffic accidents: they tested a group of "normal" people (are those really out there?) and a group of police officers (that those are not "normal" I can confirm) thru presenting accident situations to them for a limited time like 60 seconds. The goal was to find out a) how different the situation details would be remembered by each person and b) if the professional education of the officers would make any difference. Well, the results were horrible for both groups almost to the point that a judge says he could not use eye witnesses anymore in his trials and in combined results the police officers -trained ground abutments of our society- were much worse (by over 10%). Wrong memories on important details like gender of the person driving etc. What makes you even more thinking is that over 70% of the officers were ready to swear an oath on there (wrong) testimony! Ok, enough of these disturbing sidenotes and back to Barry. Now Barry himself admits that there was no "great laydown" and that he called my final bet on the river. If he really had put any chips into the pot after the showdown itself it totally passed me. I am sorry to any reader of our little blog here in case you took part in one the various discussion of the hand and either defended Barry for wrong (about his "ridicoulous" laydown as some have stated) or attacked him for the very same thing. In any case, attack me. Send me your flames or just sit down at any table I am playing, I might pay you off with AK vs. your KK. Proven and confirmed.


**********************


Sundays pokerstars $500,000 guaranteed ($215 buyin) saw me reaching the money, place 299th out of nearly 3,200 players. I got a whooping 300something dollar payout that makes us losing only about $100 on this tournament as Katja played there also. I choosed the wrong strategy there when deciding after an ugly beat with about 380 players left (324 on the money) that reaching the money would not be a bad idea and so I missed some good opportunities to steal myself some chips.


In a monday $109-R NLHE tournament on stars I got far as 16th out of 90 (9 paid) and that even without taking any rebuy and losing 3 good sized pots in a row to all-in players in the middle/late stage with about 35 players left. Two of them with over 70% favorites like AKs vs. A9o or 77 vs. 55 and one with JJ (me) against AKs. I could have reached the money by just holding myself but having my mistake from the sunday nights tourney fresh in memory I decided to defend my BB against a guy that had raised me 10+ times on the button and I always folded to him when he raised me one more time and I found A8s I went all-in with an about average sized stack. He called in a split-second with his AA... outch. My move was questionable and I talked quite some time with Katja about it.


**********************


Saturday Katja and I went to a live 10/20 limit holdem game after we went to a birthday party. The evening was fun but uneventfull. Katja won about €10 and I made a little over €200, mostly thanks to the various sidebets I did with our friend Kai. They were fun and even better, they created the "illusion of action" for me, which is seldom neccessary for me but was this night as I played maybe 3 hands - in one I lost AQo on a AQ6 flop to a river K which made JTo win and in another I lost top pair aces to a turned trips. Did I really won a pot that night? Oh yes, when 77 tried to bluff me with QQ on a ace high flop but failed to look me into the eyes. Great read against a 20 years old new player... lol.



Category: Our poker life

Trackback: URL: https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c0c9653ef00e5507ea6368834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mail from Barry Greenstein:

Comments: i didn't even noticed that you raised utg with QQ. i wasnt paying attention and treated it as a 'live-raise'. uhm..and btw the flop wasnt ace high, it came KKx ..and i'm 21 years old..lol

Posted by: jak (Aug 16, 2005 4:25:16 PM)

New comment: Sorry, comments are closed.